Internet Editor’s Note: Dr. Berger and his colleagues recently published an article titled “Internet-based guided self-help for several anxiety disorders: A randomized controlled trial comparing a tailored with a standardized disorder-specific approach” in Psychotherapy.
If you’re a member of the Society for the Advancement of Psychotherapy, you can access the Psychotherapy article via your APA member page.
Not a member? Purchase the Psychotherapy article for $11.95 here.
Or, Join the Society for $40 a year and receive access to more than 50 years of articles.
Research on Internet-based psychotherapy treatments for depression, anxiety disorders and other conditions has grown rapidly during the past 15 years, and the evidence shows that some forms of Internet-based treatments often result in similar outcomes as traditional face-to-face psychotherapy.
Surveys report lifetime prevalence rates of mental disorders of up to 47.4%, but only a small proportion of individuals in need receive treatment (Kessler et al., 2009).
One solution to the many challenges mental health care is facing is the use of new technology such as the Internet. Internet-based interventions can be delivered to large populations and they can be used flexibly and accessed easily.
Internet-based treatments can be distinguished depending on whether the Internet is used to communicate and/or to deliver information. There are:
(a) Web-based unguided self-help programs using the Internet as a delivery medium,
(b) Internet-based guided self-help approaches, in which the presentation of a Web-based self-help program is combined with regular contact with a therapist or a trained supporter, and
(c) Internet-based therapies such as e-mail, chat or videoconference-based therapies, in which the Internet is only used for communication purposes.
Internet interventions that include therapist contact can further be divided into those that involve real-time (synchronous; e.g. face-to-face, chat, video, telephone) or delayed (asynchronous; e.g. e-mail) interaction with patients.
Treatment Models for Internet-based Psychotherapy
Most Internet-based psychotherapy treatments are based on cognitive-behavioural models (Andersson, 2009), but other approaches such as psychodynamic, interpersonal and eclectic (or integrative) treatments have also been evaluated (Andersson et al., 2012b; Donker et al., 2013; Meyer et al., 2009).
A recent development is the use of transdiagnostic and tailored treatments that address the problem of high comorbidity rates in patients with common mental disorders (e.g. Titov et al., 2011; Johansson et al., 2012; Berger, Böttcher, & Caspar, 2014). While transdiagnostic treatments target common elements of several disorders, Internet-based tailored treatments do not use the same protocol for all patients but individually tailor the self-help material to the symptom profile of a patient.
Most of the growing body of evidence comes from studies evaluating guided self-help treatments in which the main component of the intervention is a Web-based self-help program. Such programs are typically arranged into a series of lessons or modules that include exercises and homework assignments.
While patients work through the program, therapists assist and support patients. The amount of contact between patients and therapists and the time therapists spend working with patients varies between studies. However, the majority of interventions only involve minimal guidance via e-mail, which requires considerably less time than face-to-face psychotherapy. Often, minimal guidance consists of a weekly feedback to patients on their behavior and progress in the self-help program. It is mainly aimed to motivate and reinforce the patients' independent work with the self-help guide and to provide patients with a time structure that corresponds to the weekly scheduling of face-to-face therapy.
Efficacy of Internet-based Guided Self-help Treatments
Independent replications have shown moderate to large effect sizes for Internet treatments in comparison with control groups for the efficacy of Internet-based guided self-help treatments for anxiety disorders and depression (Hedman, Ljótsson, & Lindefors, 2012.). Moreover, in some direct experimental comparisons between Internet-based treatments and face-to-face therapy, no differences have been found between the two approaches (e.g. Andersson et al., 2013; Hedman et al., 2011).
An important limitation of the evidence is that most of the studies were efficacy trials conducted in university-based research settings with participants recruited from the community. However, in a recent review, four controlled trials and eight open studies conducted under clinically representative conditions were identified showing that the promising effects of Internet-based guided self-help treatments can also be observed when the treatment is transferred to regular clinical settings (Andersson & Hedman, 2013).
The Importance of Therapist Contact
The available evidence clearly suggests a superiority of guided versus unguided self-help treatments (Richards & Richardson, 2012; Spek et al., 2007). The main problems of unguided Web-based programs are the usually low adherence to treatment and the high drop-out rates. There are exceptions in studies on unguided treatments in which contact with a clinician was established before the treatment started (i.e. during a diagnostic interview; Berger et al., 2011).
A recent systematic review of Internet interventions for depression concluded that any contact with a clinician, including contact before treatment, may improve outcomes (Johansson & Andersson, 2012).
There are other advantages of guided over unguided treatments such as the fact that clinicians may assist patients to access other services that may be required such as crisis services or other forms of treatments (e.g. face-to-face psychotherapy; Andersson & Titov, 2014).
Establishing an alliance: Can therapeutic rapport be built over the Internet?
There are several studies investigating the therapeutic alliance in Internet psychotherapy interventions. Self-reported patient ratings on the working alliance are high across several studies, indicating that Internet-based treatments tend to generate a strong therapeutic alliance. However, results on the association of the working alliance and outcome are less consistent: There are some studies in which the online alliance predicted outcome (e.g. Wagner, Brand, Schulz, & Knaevelsrud, 2012) and others in which no relationship was found (e.g. Andersson et al., 2012a).
Responding to crises and maintaining confidentiality
How do therapists respond to crises such as suicidal ideation or threats? It can be challenging to adequately and immediately deal with crisis from a distance and in a time delayed communication environment (e.g. e-mail). Most studies have excluded suicidal patients. In addition, many research groups develop an emergency plan with all participants in which locally available treatment alternatives and emergency services for crisis situations are identified.
Another common concern is the confidentiality of communications and client records. Even if most providers of Internet-based treatments use encryption solutions, Internet-based communication is never completely secure.
Possible Negative Side Effects
While research on negative effects is also scarce in psychotherapy research in general, it is almost inexistent in Internet interventions. An exception is a recent study on negative side effects of an Internet-based intervention for social anxiety disorder (Boettcher et al., 2014). In this study 19 (14%) out of 133 participants reported negative effects that they related to the treatment, with the emergence of new symptoms as the most commonly reported side effect, followed by the deterioration of symptoms. Although the majority of the described side effects had only a temporary negative effect on participants' well-being in this study, negative effects need to be taken seriously and they should be studied systematically in the future.
Challenges and Future Directions in Researching Internet Psychotherapy Interventions
Some of the most important issues are:
(a) for whom and how Internet treatments work
(b) how Internet treatments can and should be disseminated and implemented into regular healthcare
(c) how Internet interventions can best be combined with face-to-face treatments
Regarding characteristics of patients who are likely to benefit from Internet-based treatments, the few predictors of treatment outcome identified in some studies should be validated in future research (Nordgreen et al., 2012).
An interesting finding of our research group is that online activity and time spent in the self-help part of the treatment during the first week of treatment was significantly associated with treatment outcome (Berger et al., 2011).
A stepped care approach in which patients are assigned to increasingly intensive treatments (e.g. patients may start with an Internet intervention and then move on to face-to-face therapy if the Internet treatment does not show satisfactory effects) is one possibility to combine Internet interventions with face-to-face treatments. However, research on stepped care models is still scarce and there are several questions and problems related to this idea (Andersson & Titov, 2014).
Combining Internet-based Psychotherapy Treatment and Face-to-Face Therapy
Blending internet-based treatment with traditional face-to-face therapy has gained in popularity (see e.g., www.ecompared.eu). It is likely that therapists are getting more and more used to providing some interventions online, while still having face-to-face therapy sessions. However, more research is needed on how Internet interventions can best be blended with traditional forms of care.
Summary and Implications
In conclusion, there is now extensive evidence that Internet interventions work for common mental disorders such as anxiety disorders and depression.
Internet-based psychotherapy interventions represent a promising complement to face-to-face therapy that have the potential to improve access to evidence-based psychological treatments.
Research on Internet interventions is moving on at a high speed, while the dissemination and sustained implementation of Internet interventions into regular care is still in its infancy.
Present and future research should therefore move on from a legitimation phase (Do Internet-based psychotherapy treatments work?) to a prescriptive, process and implementation phase (For whom are Internet interventions indicated? How do they work? How should Internet interventions best be implemented into regular care and combined with traditional forms of care?).
Cite This Article
Berger, T. (2014, October). Internet-based psychotherapy treatments. [Web article]. Retrieved from: https://societyforpsychotherapy.org/internet-based-psychotherapy-treatments
Andersson, G. (2009). Using the internet to provide cognitive behaviour therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 175-180.
Andersson, G., & Hedman, E. (2013). Effectiveness of guided Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy in regular clinical settings. Verhaltenstherapie, 23, 140-148.
Andersson, G., Hesser, H., Veilord, A., Svedling, L., Andersson, F., Sleman, O., Mauritzson, L., Sarkohi, A., Claesson, E., Zetterqvist, V., Lamminen, M., Eriksson, T., & Carlbring, P. (2013). Randomized controlled non-inferiority trial with 3-year follow-up of internet-delivered versus face-to-face group cognitive behavioural therapy for depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 151, 986-994.
Andersson, G., Paxling, B., Roch-Norlund, P., Östman, G., Norgren, A., Almlöv, J., Georén, L., Breitholtz, E., Dahlin, M,, Cuijpers, P., Carlbring, P., & Silverberg F. (2012a). Internet-based psychodynamic vs. cognitive behavioural guided self-help for generalized anxiety disorder: A randomised controlled trial. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 81, 344-355.
Andersson, G., Paxling, B., Wiwe, M., Vernmark, K., Bertholds Felix, C., Lundborg, L., Furmark, T., Cuijpers, P., & Carlbring, P. (2012b). Therapeutic alliance in guided Internet-delivered cognitive behavioral treatment of depression, generalized anxiety disorder and social anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50, 544-550.
Andersson, G., & Titov, N. (2014). Advantages and limitations of Internet-based interventions for common mental disorders. World Psychiatry, 13, 4-11.
Berger, T., Caspar, F., Richardson, R., Kneubuehler, B., Sutter, D., & Andersson, G. (2011). Internet-based treatment of social phobia: A randomized controlled trial comparing unguided with two types of guided self-help. Behaviour Research Therapy, 49, 158-169.
Berger, T., Boettcher, J., & Caspar, F. (in press). Internet-Based Guided Self-Help for Several Anxiety Disorders: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Tailored With a Standardized Disorder-Specific Approach. Psychotherapy, 51(2), 207-219.
Boettcher, J., Rozental, A., Andersson, G., & Carlbring, P. (2014). Side effects in internet-based interventions for social anxiety disorder. Internet Interventions, 1, 3-11.
Donker, T., Bennett, K., Bennett, A., Mackinnon, A., van Straten, A., Cuijpers, P., Christensen, H., & Griffiths, K.M. (2013). Internet-delivered interpersonal psychotherapy versus internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for adults with depressive symptoms: randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(5), e82.
Hedman, E., Andersson, E., Ljótsson, B., Andersson, G., Rück, C., & Lindefors, N. (2011). Cost-effectiveness of Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy vs. cognitive behavioral group therapy for social anxiety disorder: results from a randomized controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49, 729-736.
Hedman, E., Ljótsson, B., & Lindefors, N. (2012). Cognitive behavior therapy via the Internet: a systematic review of applications, clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 12, 745-764.
Johansson, R. & Andersson, G. (2012). Internet-based psychological treatments for depression. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 12, 861-70.
Johansson, R., Sjöberg, E., Sjögren, M., Johnsson, E., Carlbring, P., Andersson, T., Rousseau, A., & Andersson, G. (2012). Tailored vs. standardized Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for depression and comorbid symptoms: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE, 7(5), e36905.
Kessler, R. C., Aguillar-Gaxiola, S., Alonso, J., Chatterji, S., Lee, S., Ormel, J., et al. (2009). The global burden of mental disorders: An update from the WHO world mental health (WMH) surveys. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale, 18(1), 23-33.
Meyer, B., Berger, T., Caspar, F., Beevers, C. G., Andersson, G., & Weiss, M. (2009). Effectiveness of a novel integrative online treatment for depression (Deprexis): Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11(2), e15.
Nordgreen, T., Havik, O. E., Öst, L.-G., Furmark, T., Carlbring, P., & Andersson, G. (2012). Outcome predictors in guided and unguided self-help for social anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50, 13-21.
Richards, D., & Richardson, T. (2012). Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 329-42.
Spek, V., Cuijpers, P., Nyklicek, I., Riper, H., Keyzer, J., & Pop, V. (2007). Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: A meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 37, 319-328.
Titov, N., Dear, B. F., Schwencke, G., Andrews, G., Johnston, L., Craske, M. G., & McEvoy, P. (2011). Transdiagnostic internet treatment for anxiety and depression: A randomised controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49, 441–452.
Wagner, B., Brand, J., Schulz, W., & Knaevelsrud, C. (2012). Online working alliance predicts treatment outcome for posttraumatic stress symptoms in Arab war-traumatized patients. Depression and Anxiety, 29(7), 646–51.